Section 498A of the IPC — now Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 — deals with cruelty by a husband or his relatives toward a married woman. The offence is cognisable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable (though courts can permit compounding in genuine settlement cases). Punishment is up to 3 years imprisonment plus fine.
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDVA) is a parallel civil remedy — it allows a Magistrate to pass protection orders, residence orders, and maintenance orders without a criminal conviction.
The Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) acknowledged that 498A has become a tool for personal vendetta in matrimonial disputes and directed that no automatic arrest should be made without a Magistrate’s satisfaction that arrest is necessary. Despite this, false 498A cases continue in Pune, often filed:
A good criminal defence lawyer will pursue multiple parallel strategies:
Yes. Although 498A is technically non-compoundable, the Supreme Court in B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana held that the High Court can quash the FIR in exercise of inherent powers under S.528 BNSS even in non-compoundable offences if the parties have genuinely settled and continuing the prosecution serves no purpose. A negotiated settlement with a compromise deed, followed by an FIR quashing petition, is often the most practical resolution for both parties.
Yes. The law covers the husband and “his relatives.” In-laws, siblings, and parents can all be named in a 498A complaint. However, courts increasingly scrutinise omnibus complaints that name the entire family without specific allegations against each person. Anticipatory bail for all named family members should be applied for simultaneously.
Section 498A (now S.85 BNS) is a non-bailable offence. This means bail is not a right — it is at the court’s discretion. The accused must apply for bail before a Magistrate (for police custody) or Sessions Court (for post-arrest regular bail). Anticipatory bail applied for before arrest is the most effective approach.
No. Because 498A is non-compoundable, the wife cannot unilaterally withdraw the complaint to close the criminal case. The case continues with the State as the prosecutor. However, if both parties settle and the wife files a statement of no objection along with a quashing petition at the Bombay High Court, the court can quash the FIR and close all proceedings.
Facing a 498A or DV Act case in Pune? Advocate Akash Chikate handles these matters at Pune Sessions Court, Family Court, and Bombay High Court. Contact us for a confidential assessment.
A complete, plain-language guide to how criminal cases progress in India — from FIR registration…
What is plea bargaining in India, which cases qualify, what are the benefits and risks,…
Summoned as a witness in a criminal case? Know your legal obligations, rights in court,…
Being stalked or harassed in Pune — online or in person? Know your rights under…
Lost money to a fake trading app, stock market scam, or investment fraud in Pune?…
Someone has defamed you on WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter? Learn what Indian law says…